Obsession with Success.

This is more about ‘obsession with success’. Too many have taken what I call ‘the nation-state’ definition of success which is being ‘useful’ to the state. You can get a two-bob medal for getting shot whilst harassing other nation-states for the benefit of the war-mongers and their sponsors. You can pass nation-state exams and become a ‘professional’. We cannot run nations without trained people. You are trained for the benefit of the nation-state. Success is commonly viewed through bent telescope. Success is associated with career milestones, financial achievements, and social recognition. A woman could say to other women: “I have a successful husband. ” The message is that she has snagged a man that pays for her every whim. To the man, The successful job is a key to obtaining a beautiful wife. Homeless men do not get married. It takes little time for a female to gauge a man’s potential for financial support. A good man has always been defined in terms of what is good for women. “He is a good man. He is selfless and cares for his wife and children.” Since feminism, manliness is now associated with the number of females that a male has bedded.

The natural definition of success is to be a good family person. For males, it was to be a good father, and for females, it was to be a good mother. Being a good father also meant bringing home a significant income.

Success in the inescapable propaganda of the modern world is geared to success in careers, sport, or fame. This is heavily pushed through the education system. Previously, males went to male only schools where they received a harsh education which prepared them for the hard knocks of male life. It also taught them to accept the consequences of their actions. It stressed the concept of success and competition through the sports field and the exam system.

Under ‘equality’, feminism put pressure to class males as ‘toxic’ whilst demanding that women follow the path of these ‘toxic’ males. If women were wonderful and males were toxic, there should be a demand that men follow the superior example of women. I now find girls and women are suffering by following the path of males. I always remember the joke about another country: “Work is punishment for not steeling.” Work is called work because we would only do it if we were paid. If we lived somewhere lush and warm, we could walk out an pick some fruit and with minimal effort, live an easy life. Rich women tend not to work. I find it strange that women demanded to do this work that one would only do if paid. Every country on my travels that I have raised the question, married male were expected to hand over the wage packet at the end of each week. The older women will also tell you that: “men earned more in those days.” This would be due to the higher spending power. My house in North Perth was built in 1940 and would have been built in ten weeks by a group of ten blokes for a small family where only the man was working. Two above average incomes are now needed to buy in this area. The consequence of women propagandized into the workforce is a doubling of land prices. There was no win. This was all carried on a concept of success that was geared to careers.

The selling of success to the young has consequences. It causes an obsession with success.

Here is Google’s AI response:

Obsession with success, while potentially driving high achievement, can also lead to negative consequences like anxiety, burnout, and a skewed sense of self-worth. It’s crucial to find a balance, recognizing that success is not the sole measure of a fulfilling life and that personal well-being is equally important.

Success can be defined as the achievement of goals. Who is setting the goals? Did the individual set the goals or were they decreed by a nation-state, and education system, family, friends, or media system. Is it possible that the individual has been indoctrinated? I find this fascinating. I have fought this obsession with success all my life. I often word it this way. I went to a British grammar school. You had to pass exams to get there. There was always the question: Are you good enough to be in the top class? In my final year, I won the school mathematics prize for that year’s cohort. I liked motorcycles and I was good at mathematics. Advice was to study engineering with the hint that it was my choice! I passed special exams and went to Imperial College, London, originally set up as a place of excellence by Prince Albert in the days of Queen Victoria. We were given so much ‘homework’ that it was impossible to complete the work in the available time and live a life. The The tasks were very complex verging on impossible. I rejected the academic elitism around me. To me, it was a strange environment where people ignored each other. I eventually passed. I had developed a dislike of being in soulless rooms with persons with the single goal of passing exams. It gave me an obsession with perfection, and an obsession with success. Not to succeed was akin to failure. The opposite of success is not failure. Although my environment had given me an obsession with success it was tempered with a distrust of a system that only values success. I could word it as an education system that only values success. I remember a high school teacher giving us a rant when the class was less than cooperative. It went along the lines of: “If you don’t get on with this you will finish up as failures.” You may not be able to find the oddity in this due to your upbringing. If say half of any group sitting an exam ‘pass’ and half ‘fail’, we guarantee fifty percent fails. Should we label half the society as failures. My gripe this: At the eleven plus at the age of eleven, only fifteen percent gain entry to the grammar school. I got the school maths prize out of a cohort of say one hundred, at a guess. That puts me in the top one percent of the top fifteen percent. Word was that only the best got to Imperial College with an implied to one and a half percent. These are rubbery figures but you will get my point. Sir Thomas Rich’s Grammar School was giving students ‘fails’ even though they were earlier classed in the top fifteen percent. Imperial College was giving fails even though students were already classed as being in the top lets say two percent. My memory is of two students committing suicide. The doors of the tower in the centre of Imperial College quadrangle are locked to this day to prevent suicides. The college still has an issue with suicide. I was part of a process that drove students to kill themselves. I survived! To it’s credit, it did give me a mind to question outside the box. It encouraged me to be analytical. I can understand why a nation-state needs trained people. The nation-state cannot operate without trained people. The nation-state is more efficient with trained people. The system of training at elite levels is needed, but I am very aware of the effects that it has on those put through it.

When I was young, only the males were pushed to this extent. Feminism was propagandized using the documentation from the Jewish Bolshevik take-down of Russia. Marxism appears to be a way of destroying a nation rather than a way of running a nation. My attempted readings of Das Capital led me to believe it was a book full of gibberish. One must analyze all ‘isms’ with the same skepticism. My issue is that girls are now pushed through this same academic nonsense. Let’s start with some logic. If men are toxic and women are wonderful, why would women aspire to be like men? Should it not be that men should aspire to rise to the exemplarity levels of women? As with most propaganda and news, logic plays a negligible role and the populous repeats it as if true. The real point of this paragraph is that girls are now pushed through this sausage machine to ‘academic success’. When males do something wrong or fail, they shout ‘Fuck it. Let’s go have  beer. Women, on the other hand, tend to hold their failure inside. Women suffer from this treatment more than males. They now have higher levels of unhappiness. Success to a female before Jewish promoted feminism, was a happy family. Is it anti-Semitic to mention that most of the spuikers of feminism were Jewish? It is nonsense anyway as Semitic people originate from the middle east. A Palestinian is Semitic. Most modern Jews have no blood ties to Abraham but were forced converts by a king in Khazaria. Yet most Christians are scared of being labeled an ‘anti-Semite’ through bizarre logic and propaganda, as they are scared of being declared Islamiphobic. Just as they are scared of being labeled a failure. I spelt Islamiphobic incorrectly to show that it is a made-up word. I’ll use my spelling not the spelling of those that invented the word. It is time for Christians to ‘invent’ anti-Christianism. It is time for people to invent anti-West, which is a cop-out for saying anti-White, Whites being the most endangered ethnicity as it is destroyed by out-breeding and diversity.