Eye Games
Eye games are fun. I was talking to a girl in Yekaterinburg a few months ago. She said that when she is out-and-about, she enjoys eye games. She ‘catches’ eyes. As I sit in a cafe typing this, my fingers are bouncing but my eyes wander around the room. If somebody notices that I have looked at them, they may look my way and our eyes become locked in a mutual trance for a fleeting moment. It may be a lingering moment, but the communication is powerful. I postulate that it must be a primary communication in animals. Because we concentrate on the operation of our neocortex, we may miss the significance of this powerful communication and its influence in our subconscious. Before the smile starts, there is already a communication, even though our lips have not moved and our smile has yet to generate. When I catch someone’s eyes, I am put in a great dilemma. Do I look away instantaneously, or do I remain in a locked gaze? There is a strong impulse to look away. It can get a feeling that I have ‘violated’ their ‘space’. I am determined to refrain from looking away. I have to demonstrate strength. What I do in the milliseconds following the catching of someone’s eyes, is crucial to continued communication. On principle, I refuse to look away. I demand of myself that I do something following the catching of eyes. When I catch the eye of a girl sitting on another table in this cafe, I have an instantaneous decision to make. How do I turn this mutual meeting of eyes into some kind of respectful togetherness? A respectful nod usually works wonders. The response is needed immediately. The response is required faster than my cumbersome neocortex is capable of reacting. The eye contact communication is all over before the neocortex can give advice or make a decision. I have to rely on instinctive impulses. Logic and reason have no place in my eye contact reaction as the processing of logic is too slow. I must rely on instinct. I can train my instinctive impulse-generation. You must practice it. Go out for the day with no express purpose than to make eye contact with as many persons as possible. Be determined not to look away before the owner of the eyes averts your eye contact. Be ready for your secondary message after eye contact has been made. This morning, as I checked out of the Ekaterinberg Hotel, I crossed eyes with a nice female in her twenties. I looked down as I was on the top step of the stairs. I recognized that I had disobeyed my own rules. I glanced back at her with a look that was determined to show that eye contact was forced. Her smile increased. I looked down to my next step and looked back into her eyes as eyesight was lost as I descended. Interesting, those two seconds of my morning were easy to recollect whilst writing this paragraph, such is the power of eye communication. Thus two seconds of eye contact was one of the remembered highlights of a morning.
I was explaining this to a young Japanese-Chinese eighteen-year-old boy in the hostel in Vladivostok. He, like many others, requested assistance to improve his English speaking skills. I said: “Never look away. Never look down. It is a sign of weakness. If you look away and down, you are correctly perceived as weak.” The strongest advice I give to those requesting an English lesson from me is this: “Keep eye contact. Do not grimace. Smile to let it be known that you are enjoying the communication. Just smile and nod and the communication will continue. Just keep giving little nods and facial expressions to thank the giver of the English lesson. If you don’t, the lesson will end fairly soon.”
Yesterday, I was in a student filled cafe in the centre of Vladivostok. I was intent on writing. A trim, to the point of thinness, girl in a fine black coat sat opposite me but two seats away on this rather long table. These long tables are common in sensible cafes. They can generate communication between strangers. We crossed eyes as she sat but both looked away as if our eyes should not have crossed when they clearly had. We both obviously recognised our proximity and the neighborly nature of our seating. We both obviously recognised that we had connected with an eye crossing. The eye crossing was long enough to pose the question: “Do I reestablish communication?” There had been a sheepishness or shyness in her eyes at the time our eyes crossed. She had not rejected my eye crossing. There was no scowl. There was no derision. There was no movement in her face to indicate a welcome or a rejection of my eyes. There was no movement to suggest that further communication was welcome. This is a neocortex extended analysis of something that occurred in less than one second in the reptile subconscious. Yet this fleeting moment posed the question: “Should I further the communication?” “Would further communication be welcome?” “How do I create further communication?” I had already detected a respectful acceptance of our unneighborly arrangement. When I had entered the cafe, I had surveyed the room for an appropriate place to sit. She, also, would have surveyed the room for a suitable place to sit. If she was wanting to be alone, she would have gone somewhere where nobody could get near her. If she wanted to observe the room, she would have sat on the periphery so she could observe all action. There is every likelihood that she sat on the long table so a conversation might ensue. That is a long analysis for something such as taking a seat in a cafe, but that is how sensible humans work. Where I sit in a cafe is a significant decision. I did my usual procedure. This ‘usual’ procedure is a bit ‘naughty’. It is almost a tactic! I got on with typing for ten minutes or so paying her no attention what so ever. Note that I said: “paying her no attention what so ever”. Although I did not do it as a tactic, it is actually a tactic. She may think: “Why is he not noticing me? I put great effort into looking good!” She would not realise that us males don’t care for the time girls waste on self-beautification. I let actions and reactions happen almost instinctively. I said something to her. I did not plan what to say. I did not plan when and how I would speak to her. I let it happen spontaneously when I get a successful moment on my computer. I cannot remember what I said, however, she immediately joined me in conversation. She was a student in Vladivostok and had an ‘interview’ for a job in forty-five minutes. I explained that an ‘inter’-view was a meeting where they would check her out but also where she would be expected to check them out. That is why it is called: “inter”. They will try to see whether she is ‘good’ enough for them, but also where she checks whether they are ‘good’ enough for her. They will actually sell themselves to gain her support. I said not to be concerned like the build up to a school exam with its overture of ‘Are you good enough to pass this exam?’ It is different. They want somebody and you are very likely to be the one they want. We spent much time in conversation and the whole time our eyes were locked into each other’s eyes without any scary emotions occurring inside. The scary emotions tend to occur at the first momentary glance. Subsequent conversation was along the line of her wish to travel the world like me. She was all eyes and smiles as she devoured my approach to travel and tales of past travels. She wanted my online address to ask questions if needed. I gave her my card. She walked off with a big beaming respectful smile. Hopefully, I put her in the right frame for the interview! This fun encounter started with an uneasy non-committal crossing of eyes from two people from opposite sides of the world at different stages of life! Eye crossing is unbelievably part of our subconscious repertoire. Monitor how you use your eyes. Provoke your subconscious to create eye contact. One of my mottos: “Just do it. Don’t think about it, just do it!”
There was another girl last night. She asked if she could sit next to me to improve her English. From my time teaching English in Tehran in 1975, I learned to separate my words with a short gap and simplify my language. I sometimes say the same thing twice with different words. In between talking to others, the lesson proceeded well but not in the way she had expected. I had tapped the base of the seat next to me and said that was her spot for the evening and she need not ask again. Her English was good enough to maintain a conversation or communication. But she was missing something. Actually, she was missing a few things. When she talked to me, she shielded her mouth with her hand. I started to be tough in my conversation. Her grandmother had told her that she had horrible teeth and she should hide them otherwise nobody would like her. Things taught when very small are hard to break. I said your teeth are much nicer than mine. Mine are yellow and crooked. I held her hand down by her side to prevent her from shielding her mouth. She was happy for me to hold her hand. I guessed a father problem. I brought that up later. The next issue was the smile. She was obviously happy to communicate sitting up close to me, but she put a puzzled look when she did not understand. It took a lot of explaining that it mattered little whether she understood. A smile will cause the other person to continue in conversation even if there is no comprehension. With the smile, there is a communication of intent, a communication of interest, and even a communication of affection. She said that her upper lip was too thin to give a beautiful smile. I gave her a totally false stupidly exaggerated smile with an explanation of the fake smile generated by force of the neocortex. It is sometimes called a camera smile. I said that I chose to be sitting next to her and spend my evening helping her English because I wanted to. It was because I liked her. I explained that I would be a very happy man if my son came home with a nice girl like her. I waved my arm around the room and said that I could be sitting with anybody in the room but I chose her because I thought she was rather special. It came out that her boyfriend had called her “fat”. It also came out that she had separated parents. She had no strong father figure in her life. She was drastically self-conscious about her body. She probably allowed her boyfriend to give her an emotionally damaging ‘hit’. This hit would be like a physical punch with no physical contact. The difference is that the emotional ‘hit’ is more damaging and lasting than the physical punch. Girls have a habit of giving males an emotional ‘hit’: “Fuck off you perve!” She started to look into my eyes consistently. She had joy in her eyes. She recognized that she could influence me and get me to look after her interests with her smile. I explained that her femininity was starting to make me go like jelly inside. I wanted to teach her how to have influence over a male. She was a different girl after our conversation. I had explained how I traveled through Russia using my smile as a weapon to break down barriers. I explained how I used the smile to break barriers even with people that spoke no English. She asked me if I liked her new nails. They were long stick-on sparkly things. I said: “No. But I like your smile!” She wanted me as her surrogate father. She gave me a hug on leaving that lasted an embarrassingly long time followed by that heart shape they make with their fingers. She was now capable of using eye contact to her advantage. I had taught her how to hold a man using emotional skills. Her smile had become natural. She was no longer restricting her smile for fear of revealing her teeth and her lip that was not thin. Her smile was now wholly natural. Whist I was teaching her how to mess with my emotions, I pointed out that when she laughed, it made her boobs wiggle, which caused me to go like jelly inside. I said I was purposely trying to get her to laugh so I could see her boobs wiggle. She had no clue that she could mess with a man’s emotions in such ways. She looked into my eyes with determined fascination and purposely wiggled her boobs to see the effect that it had on me. Nobody is teaching girls how to mess with male emotions. It is an essential female skill. Mothers should be teaching their daughters. Fathers should be teaching their daughters. It is part of nature.
Some of these things may have come from past times when we walked on all fours. Males would have been interested in the girls rear end. As humans took an upright stance for upright walking, nature arranged for the breasts to become ‘full and pert’ well before the time that they are needed for milk production. We are the only animal with pert breasts before pregnancy. The cleavage often looks a bit like the backside creek. It may be why girls enjoy showing a bit of cleavage but are very careful to avoid showing nipples.
What I have observed is that girls from about eighteen to twenty-five play eye games constantly. However, middle-aged women entirely avoid eye contact. Middle-aged women often maintain a sour-face look. Somehow we know what ‘sour-face’ means. Nobody is telling girls that the psychology of an eighteen-year-old girl is entirely different to the psychology of a twenty-eight-year-old girl. Girls should be taught that their demeanor will change from eighteen to twenty-eight. Girls at eighteen glow in a manner that attracts attention. Girls at twenty-eight exude a sourness without realizing that they are doing it.
When we communicate with someone, we look into each other’s eyes. We look nowhere else, just directly at the eyes. Our eye engagement has an unwritten but strict set of rules that seem to derive from the animal kingdom rather than some human documentation. If I look for too long initially, then I am intrusive which gets the derision of ‘creepy’, ‘perve’, or whatever denouncing word they can think of. However, when communication is progressing, a whole new set of rules applies. This incudes little nods to indicate interest and permission to continue a conversation.
The cafe just closed. I rugged up as there is a bitter wind outside here in Vladivostok although it is only around freezing point. I tried to see how we cross eyes as we pass people. As a girl passes me in the street, her eyes meet mine but the look in the eyes is entirely neutral. However, we did cross eyes. We recognized each other to a greater extent than missing a lamp-post. She would recognise me if she saw me again. I would recognise her as the girl I passed earlier. Although the look is neutral, the encounter is not neutral. There is a recognition that we exist. Again, this recognition is universal in that it does not depend on the language that we were taught when young. I have to assume this recognition and eye contact predates human existence as I can detect that it occurs in other animals. As I cross eyes with someone, I get a small flutter of an emotion. I guess this is inherited from our reptile past. How I react to that minor emotion determines subsequent interaction.
Here is an example of eye contact in animals. I walked toward a ticket vending machine with a slow procedure. The lady in front had a tiny small dog in a basket which she had put on a tall chair that she had pulled up next to her. The tiddly little dog was eyeballing me as if to suggest that I had encroached on its master too closely. It did not growl but it grumbled under its breath. It was a scowl that was its attempt to tell me that I might be in peril if I approached any farther. The dog stared unflinching into my eyes in a manner that let me know that it was not happy with my presence.
I’m in another cafe wasting time before catching my overnight train to Khabarovsk.
If you are young, you need to practice this eye-contact. It is possible that your upbringing has made you self-conscious like the girl earlier whose grandmother told her that her teeth were ugly and she should not let anybody see her teeth.
I am in yet another cafe. It is dreadfully cold outside. In this cafe, there are twelve females and two males. One male is the server and the other is myself. Most are buried in their phones. Two seem to be talking about nothing of consequence.
I cannot give you a set of rules for eye-contact because it all operates from the subconscious reptile brain. The neocortex has little to do with eye-contact communication. Your neocortex does not operate quickly enough nor efficiently enough to control your subconscious reactions. I just accidently caught eyes with the male waiter behind some obstacles. I gave him a distinctive nod to demonstrate recognition and respect. This reaction took place in a flash of a second. This ‘flash of a second’ is a seriously short time to expect your neocortex to wake up. The neocortex is horribly slow. What appeared to be the owner of the cafe walked in with a large cake container. She looked like she disapproved of the amount of junk on my tiny table. We crossed eyes, but as is typical of mid-aged women, a ‘cold eye’ reply ensued, which gives the effect of ‘putting me down’ as if she believes that she is of higher status than me. If we spoke, I would have to build a status in front of her to show my worthiness as a human. These days, I refuse to play that game. However, the game still gets played, and I now mention something to demonstrate human status. It usually involves some traveling exploit. Thus, status games are played with eyes as well as words. A person that considers themselves of high-status either due to their natural beauty, wealth, or position, may use eye games to put you ‘in your place’ before any formal communication occurs. The immigration officers do this when I enter a country. I can feel my anxiety before I place myself in front of an immigration officer. I prime myself that we are all born equal. If necessary, I puzzle what the officer would look like with no clothes on! Notice that I have to play mind games on myself before an encounter. If I got the same frosty reception in a hotel, I would complain. However, it is considered normal for an agent of the state, even though they are funded by my tax payments. What is clear is that I cannot plan or make decisions at the time of making eye contact but I can give myself instructions such as: ‘Do not look away when we cross eyes.’ The waitress just walked by and we accidentally crossed eyes. I got the feeling that we both considered it ‘accidental’. I told myself: “Make sure you look away before she walks past next time.” With the caveat that I would allow my eyes to cross in some subsequent encounter. I also realise that I made sure that the two ladies on the next table might realise that I had looked in their direction a couple of times.
Back to rules for young people, particularly for self-conscious young males and self-conscious young females. This possibly means most young people! First of all, make sure that you make at least fleeting contact, even if it is so short that the recipient gets no time to respond. If you are female, you can bet that every male in the room has weighed you up. You can also bet that every female has weighed you up on some sort of bizarre hierarchy. You will have done the same to them and been careful they did not detect you doing so. If you are male, you can bet that every male has weighed you up mainly to perceive if you are a competitive or physical threat to them. The threat may be due to physical size and perceived strength but may include the likelihood of you having allies in the room, male or female. You can also be certain that the females in the room have weighed you up. Knowing that this is happens, psych yourself up for the entry. Put your mind in the right frame before entering any room. Make sure your body posture is appropriate. Enter the room in a confident and competent style. Do not make this too dramatic as you may be perceived as a threat to be taken down. If you have presence of mind, swing your eyes around the whole room as if to assess the situation. I always swing my eyes round a room. If, in doing so, I detect an appropriate person looking at me, I may return my eyes to them and put on a small smile as recognition, then look away. Ten minutes later, something may happen. Girls do this best. In one swing of the eyes, a girl can detect the entire social dynamics of a room. Males are not even aware that girls do this. Males are not even aware that a social dynamics exists. Just be aware that girls have some perceptions that are better than yours. You will have attributes that outclass them and they have attributes that outclass you.
I will continue with ‘rules’ that are more like guidelines as you cannot directly modify emotional responses to external eye contact. Be determined not to look away in a manner damaging to your status. The boy last night was an eighteen-year-old musician of mixed racial origin. People of mixed origin have a bigger battle. They are not always accepted by either of their parent’s races. This is pure observation of the behavior of races. A quick study of the Haitian Revolution, shows that the mulattos or mixed-race suffered death by black held sword. People of mixed race must win on personal character as there is less ‘in-group’ affinity.
If we look away, we signal disinterest. To look at other parts of the body is disrespectful. Too much eye contact is instinctively felt to be rude, hostile, and condescending. Too little eye contact tends to make a person appear uneasy, unprepared, or insincere. This is all done instinctively and most will get it right without conscious effort. When it comes to wooing a mate, the use of eyes becomes more intense. If a male finds a girl interesting, his gaze will linger for a few seconds. She may well play games with the attentive male. She may swing her eyes past his eyes, then come back for a second fleeting eye encounter. She is effectively saying to the male: “I caught you looking at me twice, but you will have to work a lot harder than that if you want me!” He, of course, recognizes that he was given two fleeting glances. This is better than a single glance and much better than no glance or a look of distain. Although he got no other indication such as a smile, he might as well try his luck. The game is on, fueled by eye contact.
Once I have created a recuring fleeting crossing of eyes with somebody across a room, I may play a trick and hold my hand or perhaps a menu so they cannot see my eyes. Then, I’ll peer out from behind the menu obstacle. Sometimes, the person, will march across the room as if to demand better communication. Similar eye games are great fun with children.
Even children are strong on eye contact from birth. The scientists with letters after their name tell us:
- “Eye contact is very important for a child’s brain, social, and emotional development.”
- “Newborns will be especially attracted to a few specific things, like the color red and heavy contrast.”
- “Around four months, babies start to develop more sophisticated visual perception and communication. They should be able to see colors and smile back at you when you make eye contact.”
- “Eye contact is an important step toward newborn brain development.”
- “They start to make connections between expressions and feelings. They learn how to respond and develop the ability to engage and relate to others, to regulate their own feelings, and communicate. “
- “Within the first seven hours, newborns can have an intense interest in their mothers’ face, even mimicking facial expressions.”
- “It’s expected between nine to eleven months, babies have developed the ability to follow your eye gaze, showing they understand that eyes are meant for seeing and looking.”
In the last sentence, it is suggested that the infant can ‘follow your gaze’. I read that as looking to see what you are looking at. We all do that. If we see somebody looking out of a window, we look to see what they are looking at. There is intelligent activity happening without you consciously determining to do so. Your eyes automatically peer out of the window. We even play tricks on people to get them to look somewhere stupid. If I look up at the ceiling, perhaps with a puzzled look, others may gather round me to look at the ceiling. I did not tell anybody to look at the ceiling.
I will sometimes look at a person for approximately one second, and look away at something else, as I have learned that this will arouse their curiosity. Why did I look at them only for a one second? Why did I then gaze at something else? This is very naughty of me. I was playing emotional tricks. They are puzzled as to why something else got more attention than them. An introduction is likely to follow, initiated by them. Then I look keen that they introduced themselves. Such is my deviousness. From the stories I hear, this is nothing compared to the devious tactics used by females.
Eye contact is important, particularly in dating. With eye contact you can infer a person’s interest or attraction to you.
So eye contact must not be too much. It must not be too little. It must be ‘the right amount’. So, without any written rules, and without any guidance from our neocortex, we are expected to have full command over our use of eyes. When the school-girl says: “He looked at me dirty”, the highly respected teacher could be in jeopardy of his job. He is deemed ‘guilty by accusation’. He can be destroyed by the accusation of a disgruntled teen girl. Truth is irrelevant under ‘guilt by accusation’.
Human resources departments now have rules on how long a male may look at a female before it is considered ‘sexual harassment’. The result is the Communist style of punishment of elimination of his income.
Some comments:
- When someone’s eyes are fixed on breasts, buttocks, or genitalia, the leer or stare is more likely to be treated as sexual harassment.
- Eye contact particularly seems to provide information on human readiness to communicate.
Eye contact is an important component of flirting. If a male looks at a girl, it is assumed to be sexual in nature. If a female looks at a male, it is assumed to be sexual in nature. If a person looks at a girl in a painting, it is assumed to be due to that person’s interest in art. If a male looks at a photo of a nude female, it is assumed to be sexual in nature. I’m not going to disagree as the male phallus will not rise without images of naked females. The images can be real or virtual. Women may experienced ‘intrusive’ staring from a male. In the animal kingdom it is a demonstration of sexual interest. In pre-civilization, it was a demonstration of sexual interest. Under the current regime, it is deemed to be a form of sexual harassment. The feminists may want to yell and scream, but I feel for the girls that would like to meet a partner in the modern environment where they get no signals regarding sexual interest. Here is a novel comment:
On the co-ed-strewn quad of Victoria College at the University of Toronto, I run into K, a businesswoman I know. She’s here studying for a night course. She just turned fifty, and is still attractive. But she admits looks from men are rarer. “Leering hasn’t happened in years,” she adds wistfully. Visiting Italy twenty years ago with friends, “we were furious that the Italian men pinched your bum. When we went back, in our early forties, we were furious that no one was pinching our bums.” This makes me as sad as it seems to make her.
Our two aging females are unlikely to have travelled to less civilized places where it would not have been cheeky civilized men with a pat on the bum but being held down and run through by a chorus of eager un-civilized men who are proud to show their machetes. These American women would have experienced it in their own country in tents set up for the purpose in the ‘Black lives matter’ dominated cities. (“She’s not the only one. I was at those marches and for some of the men there it was like shooting fish in a barrel with all the woke white girls and housewives opening their legs for reparations. I saw quite a few being led off the road into bushes and parks. I heard the boasts in the bars after the marches.” [*])
Here is another brazen comment:
I was staring at a great looking lady who was wearing a see-through blouse and no bra. She asked, “What are you looking at, Bud?” I replied, “I’m looking at what you are advertising.”
There is no way any amount of pressure is going to stop any male from glancing in the direction of this female:
This girl dressed herself. She did not dress like her granny, so it is her choice of clothes. The trousers would have been carefully chosen to have that close fit. She was dressing to be noticed. When looking at the picture, your eyes probably kept coming back to her eyes. Eye contact plays a fundamental role in human communication and relationships and we even do it with photographs.
I expect your eyes made strong contact with the eyes of the lion above. I guess that most of your time was spent gazing into the lion’s eyes possibly with the determination not to be overwhelmed by the ‘stare’ of the animal.
Eye contact is an important contact. Eye contact is common in the animal kingdom. In most primates, eye contact tends to be a signal of threat. It has connotations of social status and possible physical aggression. However, in humans and some of the primates that live in communities, eye contact is more likely to communicate emotional states. Eye contact is important in the different species, but may have different messages. It is often a behavior in establishing dominance. One animal in a dominance hierarchy may challenge the dominance through eye contact. Dog handling manuals often suggest the avoidance of direct eye contact with hostile dogs to avoid hostile attacks. Dogs often perceive eye contact as a threat. I do the opposite and try to stare them out. My look has an element of ‘watch out for my right foot’.
Dogs can often detect various human actions such as, such as body direction, gaze direction, head orientation, along with eye orientation. Eye contact particularly seems to provide information on human readiness to communicate. When there is such an clear cue, dogs tend to follow human communication gestures more readily.
Face and eye recognition is natural to all vertebrate social species. Such behaviours can be detected in many fish, some reptiles, most birds, and most mammals. In these animals, communication between members of the same species often involves the activities of the head, mouth, and eyes. A key sentence is: “A number of vertebrate species easily recognize the eyes of a human and ‘know’ when they are being looked at.” [*] This would be where we got the ability to know when we are being looked at.
Being looked at elicits a reflexive, involuntary response. Humans can detect that they are the target of another’s gaze through subcortical neural pathways, even without conscious awareness1. Detection of direct gaze in turn triggers a cascade of activation in social cognition centers of the brain that underlie the self-conscious state of arousal and endocrine responses we experience as the “feeling of being looked at”2. [*]
We thus have a subconscious awareness of being looked at by people. We would have inherited this from our animal kingdom ancestors. My own experiments suggest that adolescent girls are more aware than most of who is looking and grown men are highly aware of the presence of ‘interesting’ females. This being a euphemism for ‘fertile’ females.
In birds there is a large variety of responses to eye contact. In parrots, the eyes are part of a body language signal system that also involves posture, beak/tongue movements and subtle shifts in wing and body feathers. Staring down a strange parrot can get you bitten, while looking a parrot in the eye while opening your mouth and moving your tongue signals friendly behavior. [*] …
It is unlikely that other invertebrates have “facial recognition” hardware or software built in as most have no “face” to speak of. Of course “eye spots” and other such markings are evolutionary adaptations gained through natural selection that allow the critter to avoid being eaten by predators that do have eye/face recognition abilities (especially birds). [*]
Baboons gaze at each other during courtship. These animals branched off of our human evolutionary tree more than nineteen million years ago, yet this similarity in wooing persists. Anthropologist Barbara Smuts said of a budding baboon courtship in the outback in Kenya: “It looked like watching two novices in a singles bar.”
This next blog entry on ‘Hunting Talk’ indicates that a bear knows when it has been seen. The bear sits quietly within eyesight, but disappears when it notices that the human has gazed upon it.
Paul
Western Montana
Last week, on my last bear hunt of the spring season, I walked right up on a bear. My hunting partner and I were slowly working our way to the top of this mountain where we knew there had been a bear earlier in the season. All of a sudden we ran into four huge piles of bear scat and were checking them out and having a brief and quiet conversation about it. My partner then says, “there he is”. The bear was 35 yards away sitting behind a down tree watching us. The moment he saw us see him, he was gone.
Here is another comment on the same blog:
I agree there is some phenomenon with direct eye contact. The “jolt” effect. In the same way it plays out when looking for a friend in a crowd or when you get busted stealing an innocent glance at the best looking girl in the room!
And another from the same conversation:
Have you ever been at a bar, restaurant, or other gathering and, out of the blue, you could sense that somebody is looking at you? It’s weird. It has to be a nature thing.
And a comment about a double-bluff where the hunted animal looks elsewhere as if it has seen a predator preying on the predator.
There is a reason why some prey animals and insects have eyespots. They fool the predator into thinking something is hunting him back or they draw their attention into attacking a nonessential part of the body. It’s because of things like this in the animal kingdom that I’m a firm believer in a persons eyes being a dead giveaway. I try to either look out of the peripheral or “squint” as much as possible when I have an animal coming in.
Look at the power of the eyes in this image.
Eye contact is defined as the prolonged looking by one animal directly into another’s eyes13. It is distinct from gaze following, which also relies on the ability to detect and interpret gaze but with the purpose of mutually attending to an object during a cooperative task10,19,20,21. While eye contact and gaze following are undoubtedly related as components of a larger communicative repertoire, they serve different and distinct purposes among primates. Theories such as the cooperative eye hypothesis22 make the claim that gaze following (absent of head movement) has evolved as a distinctly human behavior with the purpose of supporting complex cooperative social tasks. Conversely, the use of eye contact as a signal of social intent is a behavior seen across the primate order. [*]
Many feminist types have demonized the eye contact common to males. Yet the above quote contains: “the use of eye contact as a signal of social intent”. Stand against the Feminists and utilize eye contact. Never forget that “eye contact is a signal of social intent”.
Here is an Indian take on the topic. Under the Indian law on Sexual Harassment of Women ( prevention, prohibition and redressal act) , 2013, sexual harassment is broadly classified into verbal, non verbal, and physical. Staring would qualify as non verbal sexual harassment if the attention is unwanted, uncalled, and unsolicited. If a woman states that the attention is creepy and uncalled, it amounts to sexual harassment and is a crime.
In times gone by, it was a complement:
The problem with criminalising eye contact is that girls that are hunting for a husband, get no feedback to their tactical movements.
Some will have problems with eye contact. Some people are imply uncomfortable with direct eye contact and they may also be uncomfortable with being sociable and with sharing in another people’s emotions. I find it rather fun. With direct eye contact, we receive emotions in an unconscious way. It enables us to better understand another person. This is at times uncomfortable. As protection, one can avoid eye contact. If I wish to avoid taking on other people’s dramas, I will avoid looking into their eyes for longer than necessary to maintain the conversation. I will talk so that I am using logic. This impedes the emotional takeover of my body. The same occurs when a girl tries to mess with my emotions using her youth and femininity. If she detects that I find her interesting, she may crank up the femininity which has the potential to make me go like jelly inside. I can only prevent this emotional takedown by looking away or by talking so that I am using logic to mask any emotional effect on my neocortex. It is necessary in other emotional situations to encourage logic to dominate so that the emotions are kept at bay. The emotions are occurring naturally in response to the activities. To prevent emotional activities from paralyzing my ability to use common-sense, it is necessary to overwhelm your thinking with logic and talk.
Girls can be extremely good at this. They can even make you feel guilty for things that you have not done! One has to be on guard with girls so that they don’t get ‘one over you’ with their emotional skills. Provided you can protect yourself against any excesses, it is a great part of a day to enjoy the emotional influence that girls can have over your emotional state. At the motorcycle club, I say to the boys: “Which is scarier — racing a motorcycle or talking to girls?” The answer is always: “Talking to girls.” This is not because girls are scary in a physical way but because the emotions can get a bit out of hand. Never forget that in the whole of the animal kingdom, the main task of males is to chase females. The noble purpose of this is the continuance of the species. As such, the male will come under the emotional influence of the female even though he has the greater physical strength.
Now we have established the importance of eye contact, let us study ‘eye games’. When sitting on a park bench there is a tendency to ‘people watch’. Each person is evaluated in what appears to be a subconscious manner. The evaluation by a male is close to this series of questions. If observer is male and the passerby is male, the questions run: Are they a threat? If so, do I need to prepare a rapid exit? Is it a person I might like to meet? If so, I let the subconscious, with it instinct, determine how to establish contact. I never calculate this. I always let meeting or greeting operate on instinct. Instinct is so genuine. Sometimes it will be a hand gesture. Sometimes a nod. Sometimes a verbal greeting. The little nod is effectively saying: “I come in peace. I am no threat to you.” It will have an element of respect and, from that, a conversation may ensue. I thus do not formally create conversational meetings — they occur naturally. I do not plan my words. I let my brain generate the conversation instinctively.
I have a lot of small chats in a day. Today included a trim Korean girl on a working holiday and a few others. If the observer is male and the passerby is female the procedure is entirely different. The male brain automatically detects if the girl is ‘interesting’. This basically means: ‘Are they of breeding age?’ The brain determines if the female is between eighteen and twenty-eight. If they female is not in this age range, the male brain has little interest in them. If they are classed as ‘interesting’, the brain then asks itself automatically: “Would I or wouldn’t I?” This is instinctive. Is the girl mating material? The brain then analyses: “Keep or run?”, which really means is she ‘marriage material’. Would I marry or run after the event? I have checked with other males and they agree that this happens in their brain. The decision on ‘marriage material’ is made in a matter of a few seconds without actually meeting or talking with the female. Some researcher suggests this happens in about eight seconds. I think it is possibly less. We can guess that similar is happening in the brain of a male crocodile. The decision is made on a number of factors. Girls classed as marriage material may not be the ones that would win the local beauty contest. Those girls may be classed as trouble or ‘high maintenance’ or likely to have too many suitors. I am beginning to think that what the male sees a beauty in a girl is actually her suitability to make a good mother. It is not the same as a beauty measured in a beauty contest. Neither is perfection expected. The male overlooks minor flaws. There are vast differences in male’s definition of beauty. Some males like trim fit athletic girls. Some like big strong girls. Some like big back sides. Some like trim firm backsides. Some like big boobs. Some prefer teardrop boobs. Girls fretting over their body image are all likely to be on somebody’s list of dream girls. I explain this to girls partly because I hate fake anything, but I particularly hate fake boobs. I find it irksome listening to a girl with fake boobs and thick make-up telling me: “All men lie!” Make-up is lying! Fake boobs is lying! High-heel shoes is lying!
When you are in a place with many people spread around, there is a tendency for your eyes to move around and evaluate each person. Eyes will cross regularly in most venues. I have noticed that eye avoidance occurs on metro trains and buses and in busy streets. You will catch people’s eyes and different reactions will occur. Eye games will be happening. My eyes move around the room as I am typing and regularly catch eyes as the others in the room are playing eye games also. Various actions occur when eyes of strangers cross.
Here is somebody with an eye contact problem:







